Quantcast
Channel: Cox forum - dslreports.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5880

[CA] Unacceptable Latency to California Servers - Solution?

$
0
0
San Diego, Ca Hello, Let me begin that I have been dealing with unfavorable latency issues w/ my Cox HSI (Fastest Package, Premiere I believe). I have posted my issues on these forums before to only here; "I don't see any issues w/ your traceroute, your latency isn't that high so I don't see what your issue is, there's nothing your ISP can do to alter your routing to something more favorable, etc... Here's a little background about myself so you can better understand my frustration and why my standards are significantly higher than your standard Internet user. 1) I'm a competitive gamer that generates a good deal of income from it, sponsored player and all. I'm at the top of the pack in regards of 'professional gamers,' and when competing against other top players, that extra 15-30ms makes a HUGE difference. 2) I compete in fast-twitch FPS shooters where latency is a HUGE deal and anything above 45-50ms is unacceptable when competing online. My competition will always have between 15-25ms less than me where in 'fast-twitch' shooters is a huge disparity and disadvantage. I know in RPG based games, having a ping of 50-150ms is acceptable because it's not based solely on nano-second based decisions and shot selections. This is not the case in my situation. I have called countless amount of times to tier 2 tech support for Cox HSI, but they can NEVER help me. I'm told that they don't see a problem because my download/upload are always maxed out which is great, but my primary concern is latency, not bandwidth. Here are some traceroute examples: Here is the server I frequent the most. I live in San Diego, and this server is located in Los Angeles. My latency to Los Angeles is the worst and often worse than servers in San Jose California and Seattle Washington. Tracing route to jennyfur.pelican.org [76.74.236.91] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.0.1] 2 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 1.0.133.10.in-addr.arpa [10.133.0.1] 3 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms 162.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.162] 4 10 ms 7 ms 9 ms 204.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.204] 5 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms fed1dsrj02-xe130.0.rd.sd.cox.net [68.6.8.4] 6 40 ms 41 ms 41 ms 109.2.1.68.in-addr.arpa [68.1.2.109] 7 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 10ge.ten1-3.dal-eqx-cor-1.peer1.net [206.223.118 .30] 8 55 ms 54 ms 54 ms 10ge.ten1-2.la-600w-cor-2.peer1.net [216.187.124 .121] 9 55 ms 54 ms 55 ms 10ge.xe-0-3-0.lax-600w-sbcor-2.peer1.net [216.18 7.88.46] 10 57 ms 57 ms 59 ms 10ge.xe-0-0-2.lax-600w-sbdis-1.peer1.net [216.18 7.88.138] 11 52 ms 54 ms 52 ms jennyfur.pelican.org [76.74.236.91] Trace complete. Here is a trace to a Texas Server I frequent in which I ping better than to the above Los Angeles server from San Diego. Tracing route to 26.243.174.69.in-addr.arpa [69.174.243.26] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.0.1] 2 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms 1.0.133.10.in-addr.arpa [10.133.0.1] 3 13 ms 9 ms 10 ms 162.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.162] 4 12 ms 7 ms 9 ms 204.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.204] 5 45 ms 8 ms 51 ms fed1dsrj02-xe130.0.rd.sd.cox.net [68.6.8.4] 6 39 ms 38 ms 38 ms 109.2.1.68.in-addr.arpa [68.1.2.109] 7 39 ms 39 ms 41 ms 10ge.ten1-3.dal-eqx-cor-1.peer1.net [206.223.118 .30] 8 47 ms 48 ms 47 ms 10ge-ten1-2.sat-8500v-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.1 24.78] 9 53 ms 50 ms 50 ms 10ge.xe-0-0-1.sat-8500v-sbdis-1.peer1.net [216.1 87.124.66] 10 49 ms 48 ms 46 ms 26.243.174.69.in-addr.arpa [69.174.243.26] Trace complete. Here is a trace to google.com which averages 180ms which I find incredibly odd. Tracing route to google.com [173.194.69.113] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.0.1] 2 10 ms 8 ms 13 ms 1.0.133.10.in-addr.arpa [10.133.0.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 162.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.162] 4 9 ms 7 ms 11 ms 204.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.204] 5 8 ms 9 ms 13 ms fed1dsrj02-xe130.0.rd.sd.cox.net [68.6.8.4] 6 38 ms 33 ms 31 ms paltbprj01-ae2.0.rd.pt.cox.net [68.1.2.98] 7 32 ms 31 ms 33 ms 213.51.125.74.in-addr.arpa [74.125.51.213] 8 36 ms 37 ms 34 ms 114.240.85.209.in-addr.arpa [209.85.240.114] 9 33 ms 37 ms 34 ms 63.250.85.209.in-addr.arpa [209.85.250.63] 10 23 ms 24 ms 23 ms 204.174.233.64.in-addr.arpa [64.233.174.204] 11 76 ms 74 ms 73 ms 82.239.14.72.in-addr.arpa [72.14.239.82] 12 84 ms 81 ms 84 ms 5.48.239.216.in-addr.arpa [216.239.48.5] 13 97 ms 95 ms 97 ms 13.235.14.72.in-addr.arpa [72.14.235.13] 14 109 ms 101 ms 101 ms 92.239.14.72.in-addr.arpa [72.14.239.92] 15 107 ms 103 ms 108 ms 251.252.85.209.in-addr.arpa [209.85.252.251] 16 174 ms 172 ms 168 ms 219.46.239.216.in-addr.arpa [216.239.46.219] 17 169 ms 168 ms 167 ms 175.235.14.72.in-addr.arpa [72.14.235.175] 18 181 ms 186 ms 177 ms 233.43.239.216.in-addr.arpa [216.239.43.233] 19 183 ms 183 ms 182 ms 12.47.239.216.in-addr.arpa [216.239.47.12] 20 183 ms 182 ms 184 ms 53.48.239.216.in-addr.arpa [216.239.48.53] 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 183 ms 184 ms 182 ms bk-in-f113.1e100.net [173.194.69.113] Trace complete. Note: I decided to install ATT Uverse along w/ my Cox HSI hoping to alleviate my Latency issues, and my latency is now cut in half to most California based servers, about 28ms on average. I use my ATT Uverse only to play on California servers, then I switch to Cox HSI to play interstate, because my pings to servers outside of California are about 15ms better on Cox than on Att Uverse. Unfortunately, ADSL is not available in my area, so I can't request to be put on fastpath to cut my latency by about 15-25ms. Instead, I'm stuck with VDSL2+ which is ONLY interleaved. So, I switch between ISPs depending on the server I'm playing on. Here is another tracert to a local server located about 10 miles from me: Tracing route to 72-11-224-130.static-ip.telepacific.net [72.11.224.130] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.0.1] 2 9 ms 8 ms 7 ms 1.0.133.10.in-addr.arpa [10.133.0.1] 3 9 ms 9 ms 11 ms 160.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.160] 4 8 ms 9 ms 11 ms 202.11.6.68.in-addr.arpa [68.6.11.202] 5 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms fed1dsrj01-xe130.0.rd.sd.cox.net [68.6.8.0] 6 88 ms 31 ms 31 ms paltbprj02-ae0.0.rd.pt.cox.net [68.1.0.235] 7 33 ms 33 ms 35 ms xe-7-0-3.edge1.SanJose2.Level3.net [4.28.172.17] 8 42 ms 48 ms 48 ms vlan80.csw3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.152.190] 9 32 ms 32 ms 33 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.153.9] 10 46 ms 45 ms 43 ms ae-2-2.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.132.10] 11 33 ms 30 ms 32 ms ae-63-63.csw1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.137.3 4] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 45 ms 46 ms 46 ms ae-5-5.car1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.69.133.205] 14 45 ms 43 ms 51 ms TELEPACIFIC.car1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.30.3.19 4] 15 35 ms 31 ms 31 ms gi23.210.cr1.sndkca.telepacific.net [208.57.10.6 5] 16 47 ms 128 ms 133 ms ge100.mr2.sndkca.telepacific.net [216.70.224.150 ] 17 49 ms 49 ms 47 ms 64-73-249-46.static-ip.telepacific.net [64.73.24 9.46] 18 48 ms * 50 ms 72-11-224-130.static-ip.telepacific.net [72.11.2 24.130] Trace complete. Right now, when using Cox HSI, I have to pay for additional proxy/vpn services to alter my route to lower my latency. When connecting through a VPN server, my ping is 14-20ms to 76.74.236.91 (los Angeles Server). Unfortunatley, I have ceased using this means of altering my route to lower my latency because my ping jitter is too high. It often jumps 20ms which causes warping which is unacceptable during competitive play. I'm truly hoping there is a solution to my problem to fix my latency issue, a issue I've been dealing with for several years. A couple years back, I pinged sub 20ms to Los Angeles servers and 25-30ms to San Jose servers, but those days are long gone. Any help on the above matter will be much appreciated, so thank you in advance. Some insight and possible solutions is what I'm looking for. Thanks!

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5880

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>